EnigmA Amiga Run 1995 November/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 02 (1995)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1995-11][Skylink CD].iso/earcd/docs/lwml9506.lha/LIGHTWAVE-JUNE95/[e-mail]_Fri Jun 16 23:28:01 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-07-04 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA179400481; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 23:28:01 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from heather.wis.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA179320477; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 23:27:57 -0700
Received: from njland.UUCP (uunjland@localhost) by heather.wis.com (8.6.9/heather) with UUCP id BAA05746 for [e-mail]; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:08:55 -0500
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Kim Thomas (rendering backwards)
From: [e-mail] (ROBERT COHEN)
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 18:13:00 -0500
Organization: New JerseyLand 426 Slocum Ave Neptune, NJ 07753 908-918-8682
Reply-To: [e-mail] (ROBERT COHEN)
X-Mailreader: PCBoard Version 15.21
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.10
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

If you are laying the PC frames directly to the PAR, things should work
out fine.  The only thing to watch for is... when you flip frames which
have been field rendered, they don't work out due to the fact that the
fields are suggesting "forward" motion.  Now since I have NOT rendered
anything backwards to date, I can't say if rendering the scene backwards
in field mode will offer you any similar probelems (as the scene is not
being flipped, just the rendering order), but my "guess" would be NO.

Good luck... Let us know how you made out, as many others will soon be
doin the same thing.....

[e-mail]
--
[e-mail] (ROBERT COHEN) sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]